Do I see the other
or do I project?
The gaze is not innocent. Every time you see, something of you looks with you.
The words that follow are not definitions.
They are shifts in gaze.
Here EXPOSE ceases to be formulation
and becomes consequence.
I discovered I was calling “objectivity” what was actually habit.
— M.
I thought I was observing an error. I was defending a position.
— A.
I thought I was describing a fact. I was already judging.
— G.
I realized the word “always” was my way of not seeing.
— L.
I thought I was neutral. I was merely invisibly aligned.
— student
The conflict changed when I suspended the first interpretation.
— R.
I realized my certainty came from haste.
— D.
I saw that the label reassured me more than reality.
— T.
I realized I was calling “realism” my fear of hoping.
— G.
I realized I wasn’t listening: I was preparing my answer.
— university professor
I realized I was calling “frankness” what was lack of attention.
— P.
I realized that silence was not absence, but resistance.
— researcher
I understood that truly looking requires more time than I was willing to give.
— V.
I understood that the discomfort I felt was not about the other, but about the image I had built of them.
— researcher
I discovered that what irritated me was something I did not accept in myself.
— S.
I thought I was looking at a person. I was looking at a role.
— professor
I understood that the other was not who I had decided they were.
— C.
I realized I was not seeing: I was recognizing.
— F.
I discovered that the image I was defending was my own.
— E.
I thought I was protecting a principle. I was protecting myself.
— anonymous
It was not the other who changed. It was the way I saw them.
— M.
This is not a testimony about EXPOSE.
It is a shift in gaze.
I thought I knew who she was. I only knew where I had placed her.
— G.
EXPOSE does not ask to be followed.
It only asks that, for a moment,
you not follow yourself.